In addition to law and language generally, this blog explores philosophy, translation, poetry (including my own poetry and translations), legal education reform, genealogy, rhetoric, politics, and other things that interest me from time to time. I consider all my poems and translations flawed works in progress, tweak them unpredictably, and consider the latest-posted versions the latest "final" forms. I'd enjoy others' thoughts on anything posted. © Harold Anthony Lloyd 2024
Showing posts with label Humanities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Humanities. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 21, 2019
Joseph Ransdell on Charles Sanders Peirce
"When the truth about Peirce's life and accomplishments becomes generally known, it will be perceived that he was not only the most omnicompetent scientific mind of his time, perhaps never subsequently to be equalled, but also a moral hero of the intellect, of the stature of Socrates: a veritable icon or paradigm of philosophia--which really means devotion to the search for truth . . . ." Joseph Ransdell, Semiotic Objectivity in Frontiers in Semiotics 240 (John Deely et al. eds., 1986).
Thursday, December 21, 2017
The Inherent Inseparability of Doctrine & Skills
A quick screen shot of my brief bit in Linda Edwards' fantastic new book The Doctrine Skills Divide: Legal Education's Self-Inflicted Wound. I think the title speaks for itself, and the book should be required reading for everyone interested in reforming legal education today.
Labels:
Case Method,
Category,
Charles Sanders Peirce,
Classical Rhetoric,
Descartes,
Experience,
Framing,
Humanities,
Jurisprudence,
Langdell,
Law,
Law School,
Legal Writing,
Meaning,
Practice,
Theory
Sunday, October 2, 2016
Blake Within Blake Within Blake Without End
As I have written before, the great William Blake magnificently employed signs beyond mere words in his poetry. His powerful illustrations of verse add much additional meaning to his work. As I have noted before, his symbols such as words are greatly supplemented by other types of signs such as the iconic signs of his drawings. He applied these same principles in reverse in his great illustrations of the verse of other poets such as Thomas Gray and Edward Young. Such illustrated verse injects blocks of symbols within Blake's icons, and it can be fascinating to replace these blocks of others' symbols with additional iconic expressions by Blake himself. Blake's illustrations repeat common themes and can build on each other in such fascinating exercises. I think Blake would enjoy seeing others doing this with with his icons, and I would enjoy seeing how others might attempt the endless possibilities of such substitutions. For example, in the illustration above I have replaced Gray's verses about the "Stern Rugged Nurse" with one of Blake's illustrations of Urizen, the severe god of reason who traps the imagination with his compasses and strict categories. The compass in fact is an awful symbol for Blake. It's no accident that the "Stern Rugged Nurse" has one in her hand just like Urizen.
Sunday, September 25, 2016
Beyond Words Alone: Poets as Artists of the Intentional
Though these definitions of poets and poetry are correct
as far as they go, they do not go far enough. Poets are artists of the
intentional; they are artists using signs that point to things beyond the signs
themselves. Since words are not the only
signs, why should poets limit themselves to words? Using C.S. Peirce’s terminology, there are in
fact three kinds of signs: symbols (arbitrary signifiers such as words), icons
(signifiers such as paintings that resemble what they signify), and indexes
(signifiers like photographs or weathervanes that participate in what they
signify). In the realm of symbols, why
should poets limit themselves to words?
In the broader realm of signs, why should poets ignore icons and
indexes? They should not of course, and William Blake gives us excellent
proof.
Labels:
Art,
Charles Sanders Peirce,
Communication,
Contradiction,
God,
Humanities,
Icon,
Index,
Interpretation,
Poetry,
Poets,
Problem of Evil,
Religion,
Rhetoric,
Semiotics,
Sign,
Signifier,
Symbol,
William Blake,
Words
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Abelard: The Peril & the Price of Careless Thought (Addition to the Apology Box)
Abelard’s Ballade
Thought is the
cruelest place where charts mark no
Fixed latitude or
constancy of shore
For shifting airy
coasts and courses. Though
Polaris holds
without, within one's oar
Has no such brilliant
constant marker for
Safe
navigation. Vague, obscure and fraught
With shifting inner
shoals, one can’t ignore
The peril and the
price of careless thought.
Did man precede the
beasts? Both “yes” and “no”
Say Testaments where
just a pair yet more
Go in the ark, where
Eve’s made second though
She’s simultaneous
in lines before,
Where we’re
commanded to love yet restore
Slaves to a master,
where it’s said we ought
Not judge yet brook
no sin. We’re fodder for
The peril and the
price of careless thought.
There’s such
confusion--turn the cheek yet go
Acquire a sword as
well? Why wasn’t more
Care taken in the
drafting? All should know
That words have
consequences. Maimed, I bore
The scars of
mixed-up syllables. Before
More suffer needless
butchery, one ought
To master
language. I explored, therefore,
The peril and the
price of careless thought.
Lord, thus I did my
volumes. Since they store
All I discovered, I
can rest. Full taught
Below, no suffering
here would teach me more
The peril and the
price of careless thought. Monday, June 13, 2016
Anselm's Short Ballade (An Addition to "The Apology Box")
I’m unsurprised
that mind persists although
The body drops
extinguished. Nothing may
Be perfect but the
Lord. That being so,
Death must be flawed
and therefore cannot stay
The intellect
forever lest we say
Death is invincible
and perfect, too.
I can’t consistently
speak such a way,
Lord. Reason will not let me turn from you.
Nor could I doubt
your being, Lord, although
You did not show your face. God is, we say,
The greatest thing conceivable. That so,
God must exist since absent things, we say,
Are less. Should God not be, that opens way
Are less. Should God not be, that opens way
To something greater: God plus being, too.
But nothing’s
greater. Logic shows the way,
Lord. Reason will not let me turn from you.
And thus I kneel in
hopeful prayer you’ll say,
“Come follow me as well in heaven, too.”
I cannot rise until
you’ve shown the way,
Lord. Reason will
not let me turn from you.
© Harold Anthony Lloyd 2016
The current contents of "The Apology Box" can be found here.
Five Warriors: Hannibal, Charlemagne, Roland, William the Conqueror, & Henry V (Additions to "The Apology Box)
Short Ballade of Henry V
(esse quam videri)
(esse quam videri)
Although my youth
was rough, I may defend
It. By its terms, one's immaturity
Is that imperfect
era one must spend
Developing, that
time when logically
The mind and morals
both are raw and we
Are all
inferior. I would not scheme
Like lesser youths
and falsely polish me--
Hypocrisy's a
sin. I'd be, not seem.
When I was crowned,
my youth was at its end.
Therefore, I ended
my frivolity
Lest I live on a
lie, lest I pretend
I somehow kept that
younger quality
That I had
lost. I acted honestly
Instead when
grown. I battled till supreme
At Agincourt without
distorting me--
Hypocrisy's a sin.
I'd be, not seem.
Lord, now I'm but a
spirit, I should be
In Heaven with the
bodiless. I’d dream
Of nothing
else. I’d feign no firmer me--
Hypocrisy's a
sin. I'd be, not seem.
Labels:
Ballade,
Charlemagne,
Ethics,
Famous People,
Hannibal,
Henry V,
History,
Humanities,
Morality,
Myth,
Poetry,
Rhetoric,
Roland,
Sonnet,
War,
War Rhetoric,
William the Conqueror
Three Religious Warriors: Richard I, Saladin, & Charles Martel (Additions to "The Apology Box")
Richard I’s Sonnet
Christ is my only
standard. As he drove
The money changers
from the temple who
Profaned it, I in
imitation strove
To save God's temples
from blasphemers, too.
If smaller groups of money
changers must
Be driven out, much more so should we drive
Out hordes of unbelievers. I was just
Therefore in how I chose to reign and live.
Although great men
have critics and I'm not
Immune, I'm confident
the worst they’ve said
Of me is I craved
men and therefore led
Men East. If true, such charge condemns me not.
In judging right and
wrong, Christ is the test.
I've read his
words. The topic's not addressed.
Saladin's Round
(By a Kurdish hero)
There is no God but
God and he is Lord
Of every atom of
creation. He
Is thus by his own
essence rightfully
The Lord of old
Jerusalem and all
Her Asian territories
rather than
Someone whose agent
sits in far-off Rome.
Someone whose agent
sits in far-off Rome
Abstractly drinking blood and eating flesh
With wine and broken
bread in temples there
Has brokered more
than mere abstractions here.
This broker's swords have broken men and spilled
Real blood and gore
throughout God’s Holy Land.
Real blood and gore
throughout God’s Holy Land
Required response and we have given aid.
We’ve had to use swords doing that though we
Preferred the use of
reason. Though we’ve won
Upon the field, our
greater victory comes
Through favoring
mercy over death instead.
Through favoring
mercy over death instead
Of other attitudes,
we’ve followed God
And done his
work. Though evil trembles at
Such simple logic,
we find rest in it--
God favors mercy and
believers know
There is no God but
God and he is Lord.
Charles Martel’s Sonnet
Though God is three
in one, it’s blasphemy
To tolerate an
earthly trinity
Of Christian, Jew,
and Muslim. There can be
Just one true faith
since Christianity
Alone is
scriptural. Of course God knew
Martel means
“hammer” and called me to do
The labor. Although just a bastard to
That beast Plectude,
great battle plans I drew
For plated men and
beasts. At Poitiers,
Design met
field. There my troops held at bay
The foreign hordes our armor drove away
From Christendom forever. Lord, I pray
For Heavenly
inclusion having fought
For God and
Christendom as scriptures taught.
© Harold Anthony Lloyd 2016
The current contents of "The Apology Box" can be found here.
Sunday, June 12, 2016
Sonnets of Seven Greek Philosophers: Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus, Zeno of Citium, Diogenes of Sinope, Heraclitus, & Protagoras (Additions to "The Apology Box")
Plato’s Sonnet
(A liberated caveman)
When I was tethered
up inside the cave
Where I could see
but shadows on the wall
I craved to see how
Real Things would behave.
I plotted my escape
through study: all
Real Things should
be discoverable in the end
Though first unseen
directly. I knew there
Must be Real Forms
somewhere since shades depend
On Something Real to
cast them. With great care,
I studied every
shadow so I might
Infer what cast the
umbrage. In that way
I burrowed backward
out into the Light.
I now see plainly
Forms have Forms, and they
Have culmination here in that one Form
Of Good that I predicted as the Norm.
Labels:
Aristotle,
Diogenes of Sinope,
Epicurus,
Ethics,
Famous People,
Heraclitus,
Humanities,
Interpretation,
Language,
Morality,
Philosophy,
Plato,
Poetry,
Protagoras,
Rhetoric,
Sonnet,
Zeno of Citium
Saturday, June 11, 2016
Confucius and Lao Tzu (Additions to "The Apology Box")
Confucius’s Sonnet
Mere force brings no
true order since forced change
Warps from without
and thus can never fit
An inner nature that’s
rejecting it.
Without such fit,
there’s but apparent change.
As mere force is
deficient, sages thus
Discount it. Righting wrong, they find a way
To change a man by
his own choices. Thus,
They speak and do
precisely. Sages sway
With virtue and
right language of the kind
They’ve learned in
studies of the old archives
Of ritual and common
mythic mind.
Their teaching
teaches them. Example drives
Without a whip. On
earth, in heaven, too,
Truth bans all
thrashings hells purport to do.
Lao Tzu’s Sonnet
Would breath that
loathed to make a sound in life
Somehow reverse
itself in airless death?
Would it somehow convert
itself at last
Into fools’ terms? No--death is muter still.
I’ve neither
arrogance nor wish to harm.
I’d not presume an
ant cares how my mouth
Might label it. I all the more of course
Would not presume that
heaven gives a damn.
Man’s categories cause
him needless ill—
A man can’t covet or
despise a thing
Some category’s not
disjoined from him.
Man's words spread categories' ills about.
Without air heaven
must be wordless. Hence,
I'm mute where no decrees expel me hence.
© Harold Anthony Lloyd 2016
The current contents of "The Apology Box" can be found here.
Labels:
Category,
Chinese Philosophy,
Confucius,
Duty,
Ethics,
Famous People,
Grammar,
Humanities,
Language,
Lao Tzu,
Morality,
Myth,
Philosophy,
Poetry,
Religion,
Ritual,
Tao,
Taoism,
Virtue,
Words
Boethius, St. Ambrose, and Marcion the Docetist (Additions to "The Apology Box")
Boethius's Sonnet
Was Theodoric’s
prison in the end
That proved the real
academy. Was there
They taught first
hand true good cannot depend
Upon mere
fortune. There caged in despair
This humbled bureaucrat
learned power flees
In but a moment and,
too, learned, how fast
“Good” title both in
name and properties
Is marred. Yet, I found hope! Though no things last
Below at length,
that maid Philosophy
Took pity, visited
dark dungeons and
Consoled me with her
higher poetry
Of permanence. Caressing that sweet hand,
I thought no more of
nooses or of cells
But of divinity and
where it dwells.
Saint Ambrose's Sonnet
Before the awful bench
where all will stand
We come in turn to
plead and do admit
Our errors though in
doing so submit
In mitigation it was
not our hand
That sought the
staff. Instead, Milan asked. We
Were acquiescent,
humbly turned our backs
On Roman boons (yet
kept her bones as racks
For Christian
ornament--past lies would be
Upholders of the
truth.) Thus we transformed
Words, music,
marbles, even living flesh--
Behold Augustine we
baptized afresh.
Mere spirit now, our
temporal see performed,
Pray let us see
Rome’s church ascending now
Above Rome’s ruins we’ve
refurbished now.
Marcion
The Docetist’s Sonnet
I’ve kneeled before
the true God now revealed
Through that
majestic phantasm called Christ
That clarified true
faith and thus repealed
The older
books. Sweet ghost! If sacrificed,
I knew it was not
God. Perfection by
Its very terms can
never suffer. For
To suffer is to
lose, to be less than
Complete and thus
prove imperfection. Nor
Could it have been a
man. Though man could be
Sinless despite the
lie of Eden, You
Could not allow a
sinless man to be
Condemned and killed
for sins he did not do.
Great ghostly
messenger! It had to be
Of course fantastic coming, Lord, from Thee!
© Harold Anthony Lloyd 2016
The current contents of "The Apology Box" can be found here.
Cyrus and Esther (Additions to the Apology Box)
Cyrus
The Great’s Proof
It’s wrong to disown
any family.
We must be fair in
hospitality
To every member. We
may not despise
Another made in
Heaven’s image. Wise
Ones know the
converse would be blasphemy.
We had to
unify. No boundary
Is moral. Even Hebrews now are free
To come back in the
fold, to realize
It’s wrong to disown
any family.
Death can’t destroy
your Image. Unity
Has to survive the
grave and cannot be
Extinguished. Live and dead must still comprise
A common brood. We specters therefore rise
To meet you knowing
that you will agree
It’s wrong to disown
any family.
Esther's Sonnet
There’s bravery
that’s physical in bed,
That’s cousin to the
field of battle’s. I
Burned with such
valor from the day I wed
Another by whose
whim I’d live or die.
I passed, had spies,
laid trenches in the sheet.
I suffered the
assaults but never gave
A true
surrender. I held till defeat
Had closed the enemy
within his grave
With my
assistance. There’s no felony
In war’s attack, in
what I had to do.
There are no lies or
whores in battle. We
Have heroes or we’ve
cowards--just the two.
This star of Esther stayed though others fell:
By name, the heavens
are where Esthers dwell.
© Harold Anthony Lloyd 2016
The current contents of "The Apology Box" can be found here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)