Click here for a link to Thomas Swenson's Musical Score for "The Flood."
In addition to law and language generally, this blog explores philosophy, translation, poetry (including my own poetry and translations), legal education reform, genealogy, rhetoric, politics, and other things that interest me from time to time. I consider all my poems and translations flawed works in progress, tweak them unpredictably, and consider the latest-posted versions the latest "final" forms. I'd enjoy others' thoughts on anything posted. © Harold Anthony Lloyd 2024
Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts
Sunday, December 23, 2018
Monday, February 27, 2017
Neil Gorsuch? Originalism and the Ten Commandments
Current Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch claims that judges should “apply
the law as it is, focusing backward, not forward, and looking to text,
structure, and history to decide what a reasonable reader at the time of
the events in question would have understood the law to be ....”
On its face, this is at best an odd claim. Laws are generally forward
looking in their desire to govern future behavior. And even if we could
always focus back to determine legal meaning, why would we want to
disconnect meaning from ongoing life in such a way? Why, for example,
should the absence of email in George Washington’s day mean our modern
use of email isn’t covered by our modern notions of “speech”? Excluding
email from “speech” today would be silly and we have refined “speech”
to include email in both law and in life. Of course, if we refine
meaning for “speech” and “email,” why shouldn’t we do the same for other
things in other contexts as they change with time? It’s hard to see
how Originalism’s odd backwardness isn’t fatal from the outset.
Saturday, January 7, 2017
Two Performance Review Mantras (“Mercy and Truth Are Met Together; Righteousness & Peace Have Kissed”)
I. Mantra For Myself
I smile if I have shown a light.
I smile if I if I have aimed at right.
I smile if I have done my best.
Imperfect, I’ve no other test.
II. Mantra For Others
I smile if they have shown a light.
I smile if they have aimed at right.
I smile if they have done their best.
Imperfect, they’ve no other test.
Labels:
Bible,
Buddha,
Christ,
Duty,
Emotion,
Ethics,
Forgiveness,
Golden Rule,
Grace,
Humility,
Imperfection,
Jesus,
Judgment,
Light,
Mantra,
Mercy,
Performance Review,
Poetry,
Truth,
William Blake
Monday, June 27, 2016
Ezekiel: The Universe Leaps Over Heart & Head (Addition to "The Apology Box")
Ezekiel’s Double Sonnet
(A prophet of the exile)
I.
I.
A rift ran down the middle of my soul
With halves that tugged perpetually at war
And kept me torn as both a priest and man.
I found that rules and that exceptions can
Be true at once. Though contradictory,
We must have justice, must have mercy, too,
And must have death although we hear the din
Of dusty bones redressing into skin. A nation must be punished for its sin,
A nation made of aggregates where one
Thus bears the guilt of all although no one
Is guilty for the deeds another's done:
The father's never guilty for the son
Nor is the child for what the father's done.
II.
God's scroll was written to be read. Yet, God
Fed me the message, too. Sad to the ear
Words somehow tasted honeyed to the tongue.
In honeyed thought, I thought of being young
In Israel again although I knew
That logic stays me. God, though, had free hand
To seize my hair and whisk me off to stand
Outside the temple walls. I found a hole
Within one wall and peered in where I saw
Beyond facades, beyond exterior awe
To inner awe that dwarfed all things that we
(However wise) have ever felt or said.
The universe leaps over heart and head
Whose terms of course can't curb a universe
Whose essence always brings it back to God.
© Harold Anthony Lloyd 2016
The current contents of "The Apology Box" can be found here.
Labels:
Bible,
Contradiction,
Ezekiel,
Grammar,
Guilt,
Home,
Israel,
Jerusalem,
Language,
Logic,
Old Testament,
Paradox,
Poetry,
Religion,
Rhetoric,
Sonnet,
Words
Friday, June 17, 2016
Mary Magdalene (Addition to "The Apology Box")
Mary
Magdalene’s Apology
Though fathers of the church might not recall,
I was his favored ally over all--
Though I had awful moments I admit.
I was his favored ally over all--
Though I had awful moments I admit.
I saw the seven
horrid faces of
The demons driven
out. Pride lurched out first.
It smirked as it
looked back at me. It kissed
Its gilded mirror,
dropped its glass, then spread
Its filthy, gaudy
tail. It stretched its wings
And took its pompous
exit on the breeze.
Then Envy slithered
out, a serpent scaled
With eyes instead of
plates. Each lens scanned round
From different
angles not to miss a grudge.
Its filthy fangs
were always poised to strike
With venom ever
dripping. Thus, the snake
Ingested greater
poison than its prey.
Then Gluttony with well-worn teeth chewed its
Way out of me and tumbled on the ground
To roll away in its growing sphere of flesh.
Then Idleness
crawled out. Its wrinkled robes
Were stained and
filthy. It could barely hold
Its head upright
until it found a bed.
Then
heaving-breathing Avarice crawled out
So loaded down with
precious things it could
Not stand. Despite
the wealth it bore, its clothes
Were worn and fit it
poorly. Sweating, it
Crawled off
distraught--it never hauled enough.
Then lion-headed
Wrath leapt out of me.
Its awful roar was
followed by a spray
Of blood its
flailing limbs slung as it ran.
Then last of all
sprang hairy Lust. (Perhaps
I’m most remembered
for the last since it
By chance became the
final one to leave.)
O Lord, I tremble
still to think about
Those awful
spectacles as each came out.
And yet once freed
of seven demons, I
Could kneel to wash
my master’s feet. I could
Anoint his head with
oil and laud him well.
Then when his
fortunes changed, I could as well
Stand by him as they
nailed him up. And when
Some armored angels
swept him up from Hell
I could run out and
spread good news to all--
I was his favored ally after all.
I was his favored ally after all.
© Harold Anthony Lloyd 2016
P.S. In the Rhetoric to Lettie, I speculate on how Christ might have confided in his favorite disciple:
Jesus
Confides in Mary Magdalene
The kingdom is
within. Search for it there.
The sinner is the
one who in despair
Awaits the day his
chariot should come.
The kingdom is not coming. It is here.
There are no
portents, earthquakes, storms to fear
Before arrival. Simply look within.
Tell others that the kingdom is within,
That first it’s
small like seeds or leaven in
The dough but has
its powers to expand.
Be mindful of the present or you’ll miss
Brief miracles of
leavens such as this.
Live in the “am,” not
in the “will” or “was”
And revel in the kingdom found within.
There can be no
forgiveness for the sin
Of
self-rejection. Broken can’t be right.
Commit yourself at once, do not delay
To act on what
you’ve found. Though others say
That faith suffices,
fruit defines the tree.
Embrace your enemy and do no deed
You’d not have
others do to you. Once freed
From difference,
inner light uncovered shines.
Be humble and be open as a child.
Be curious and
never be beguiled
By rules or
“prophets” that snuff out the light.
For light will show whenever two are one,
Whole mountains can
be moved. Division gone,
Whole mountains
cannot claim their former place.
Know rules serve us. When bending must be done,
Bend rules to
light, not light to them. Don’t sin
By elevating
Sabbaths over light.
Though I must leave you soon, I still shall shine:
My light remains in
you as yours in mine,
And therefore
separation never comes.
Split any piece of wood and I am there.
Lift any rock and
you will find me there.
Set any table. You will find me there.
Have bread and wine in common to recall
The need to share
both food and drink with all—
And do this for
your fellow flesh and blood.
As I have done, reach out to heal the sick—
Though not just
those with fevers. Heal heartsick
And troubled
spirits, too. Do miracles.
Though I have set upon a painful course,
I choose it
freely--right could never force
A faultless one to
pay another’s fine.
No innocents are sacrificed though I
Am willing for the
sake of truth to die.
That’s what the
Cross should symbolize for you.
I’m neither Paul, nor Pope, nor Protestant.
I am before they
came, before they went.
I am before their
Sabbaths as are you.
© Harold Anthony Lloyd 2016
The Nicodemus Paradox (Addition to "The Apology Box")
Nicodemus's Double Sonnet
I saw the merit
of that holy man. I showed
Him bold respect in
public and I sat
Beside him as my
teacher. I raised up
My hand in public
when I was confused
By his
instruction: “How could an old man
Be born again?” I asked.
He answered me.
When hypocrites
would kill him in the name
Of “God” and
“Church,” I interposed myself
And spoke in his
defense. I took the risk
Without a moment’s
hesitation, and
When they had
murdered him, I helped embalm
And carry the
cadaver to a tomb.
With greater powers, I would have helped him more.
But born without them, I could do no more.
With greater powers, I would have helped him more.
But born without them, I could do no more.
Why did I yet
remain a “Pharisee”?
There only is one
true assembly of
God’s people. Words cannot change that. I'd not
Concede my notion of a "Pharisee" to frauds.
Instead, I would protect it by my deeds
Instead, I would protect it by my deeds
That would instead preserve exalted words.
I worshiped with
God’s words while others lied
With them. It was confusing. Yet, I fought
And even gave my quandary a name:
The “Nicodemus
Paradox.” If we
Use “Church” with
scoundrels it’s hypocrisy
Yet if we give them
“Church” it’s blasphemy.
With greater powers, I would have wrestled more.But born without them, I could do no more.
© Harold Anthony Lloyd 2016
The current contents of "The Apology Box" can be found here.
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
How the "Ten" Commandments Refute Originalism & Fundamentalism (With Some Help From Herod, Caiaphas & Ahab's Additions to "The Apology Box")
Conservatives often like to claim that texts speak for themselves. A review of the Ten Commandments is an easy way to see how such claims are false. First, such a review nicely shows that we must interject our own judgment even before we start reading a text because we first have to decide what the text is. When we look for "Ten" Commandments in the Bible, we won't find such a neat list. Instead, we'll find two places in the Bible (Exodus 20:1–17 and Deuteronomy 5:4–21) which support such a list though we could come up with a different number depending on what we expressly include (for example is not bowing down to other gods included in not putting other gods first or is it a separate command?) and depending upon how we group what we find. The number 10 is thus in that sense arbitrary.
Second, once we've used our judgment as to the content and number of the list, reading the commandments still requires much interpretation. For example, read literally they say that we cannot kill. That would mean we could not cut down a tree much less kill a wild beast attacking us. Of course, no reasonable person would take these words that literally and thus no honest person who is reasonable would claim we don't have to use our minds and hearts when we read a text. Instead, what we generally want to do when reading the words of others is to figure out what the speaker meant by those words. This involves engaging in what philosophers of language call pragmatics, a topic that I have written about elsewhere. Have Ahab, Herod, and Caiaphas really tried to understand and follow speaker meaning in the poems that follow?
Third, the Ten Commandments also remind us of another wrinkle in cross-language cases. The Commandments are in an ancient language that most of us cannot read. We must thus rely on translations, and translations also involve judgment and often are erroneous or questionable at best. Anyone who tells us that we can and should take a translation literally and without question is thus wrong on multiple levels.
Second, once we've used our judgment as to the content and number of the list, reading the commandments still requires much interpretation. For example, read literally they say that we cannot kill. That would mean we could not cut down a tree much less kill a wild beast attacking us. Of course, no reasonable person would take these words that literally and thus no honest person who is reasonable would claim we don't have to use our minds and hearts when we read a text. Instead, what we generally want to do when reading the words of others is to figure out what the speaker meant by those words. This involves engaging in what philosophers of language call pragmatics, a topic that I have written about elsewhere. Have Ahab, Herod, and Caiaphas really tried to understand and follow speaker meaning in the poems that follow?
Third, the Ten Commandments also remind us of another wrinkle in cross-language cases. The Commandments are in an ancient language that most of us cannot read. We must thus rely on translations, and translations also involve judgment and often are erroneous or questionable at best. Anyone who tells us that we can and should take a translation literally and without question is thus wrong on multiple levels.
Judas & Pilate Defend Themselves (Additions to "The Apology Box")
Acrostic of Judas
Justice never punishes a deed
Unless it's evil, willed, and freely done.
Did I betray? I did. But fate forced me,
And thus I did unfreely what the Lord
Set up instead as I shall briefly show.
Impelled by love, God had to make a world
Since isolation is love’s opposite.
Creation needed freedom all around--
An object of one’s love is not enslaved
Raising a contradiction: what is free
Is free to sin and has a license that
Offends morality. God's fix required
The incarnation penalty--not me.
Labels:
Bible,
Christ,
Equity,
Ethics,
Fate,
Jesus,
Judas,
Law,
Morality,
New Testament,
Poetry,
Pontius Pilate,
Religion,
Rhetoric
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Old Testament Words & Rhetoric: Ehud, Elisha, & Jonah (Additions to "The Apology Box")
Ehud’s Solid Rhetoric
(Left-handed judge who killed Fat King
Eglon)
Somehow it seems we
have reversed our roles.
I was to speak for
you in judgment, Lord,
In Eglon’s case, yet
now must plead my own
Which I presume
cannot be severed from
The former. I shall, therefore, make my case
By how I made your
own where you required
More rhetoric than
mortals could possess.
With words more
flawed and limited than yours,
My noises, meanings,
grammars would blaspheme
Should they pretend
to speak as you would do.
With proper language
absent for the task,
I would but mock
ineffability
Were I to mouth in
any way the scope
Or purpose of such sacred
agency.
Instead I thus used
your own elements.
My iron blade made your point. Although his fat
Made heavy armor, it
did not deflect
But swallowed up the
knife. His fatty folds
Released a stench
that summarized him well,
That underscored
your judgment as he fell,
And yet misled his
guards by such a smell.*
Although the
spectacle was horrid, it
Avoided sacrilege of
words not fit
For godhead or good
agents serving it.
*They thought Eglon was relieving himself thereby giving Ehud more time to escape.
Elisha’s Apology
I watched Elijah leave in
fiery flight.
The sound of
nothingness roared in my ears.
I was alone. I trembled, was in tears.
I only had his cloak
to calm my fears
As I stepped in to bear bare heaven's light.
Persuasion's
manifold. Elijah thought
The fastest and the
surest lesson taught
Was by the rod. I tried another way:
Example of good deeds can also sway.
I salted down the
spring of Jericho
And caused pure
waters once again to flow.
I turned the poison
gourds into a soup
That safely fed a
desperate, hungry group.
I made the axe-head
float back to the top
Of that deep Jordan
where they’d let it drop.
I took a little bit
of barley bread
And made a feast
where many mouths were fed.
I filled a widow's
empty jars so she
Could pay her debts
and set her children free.
I cured the awful
curse of leprosy,
And moved men with
my skills of prophecy.
Example and good deeds were rhetoric
That served me better than Elijah's stick,
And though no fiery chariot brings me
I trust the light I carry shines on me.
Example and good deeds were rhetoric
That served me better than Elijah's stick,
And though no fiery chariot brings me
I trust the light I carry shines on me.
Jonah’s
Defense
With just eight words* I brought a city round.
In rhetoric’s annals
nowhere else is found
A rival. I will move the heavens, too,
And once again will keep my phrases few.
And once again will keep my phrases few.
I erred once I admit--although I should
Feel gross aversion
handling pagan things.
Aversion keeps good order. God would not
Condemn disgust
toward anything unclean.
Instead he counseled that sometimes one should
Endure the filth he'd have one remedy.
Thus, for two reasons he unleashed the whale:
To right my course and in its belly train
Me for the stench ahead. (I spent three days
Instead he counseled that sometimes one should
Endure the filth he'd have one remedy.
Thus, for two reasons he unleashed the whale:
To right my course and in its belly train
Me for the stench ahead. (I spent three days
Within its filthy
gut till I was heaved
A chunk of living
vomit on the shore.)
I made my way to
Nineveh and gave
The famous speech. I then withdrew to watch
The consequence. Beyond doubt I'm devout
To take a
journey here, too, past the bounds
Of any maps or terms
I’ve known. I've come
(Although in fear) because God called. I would
Give that as further
proof of Jonah’s good.
*"Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown!"
*"Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown!"
Abelard: The Peril & the Price of Careless Thought (Addition to the Apology Box)
Abelard’s Ballade
Thought is the
cruelest place where charts mark no
Fixed latitude or
constancy of shore
For shifting airy
coasts and courses. Though
Polaris holds
without, within one's oar
Has no such brilliant
constant marker for
Safe
navigation. Vague, obscure and fraught
With shifting inner
shoals, one can’t ignore
The peril and the
price of careless thought.
Did man precede the
beasts? Both “yes” and “no”
Say Testaments where
just a pair yet more
Go in the ark, where
Eve’s made second though
She’s simultaneous
in lines before,
Where we’re
commanded to love yet restore
Slaves to a master,
where it’s said we ought
Not judge yet brook
no sin. We’re fodder for
The peril and the
price of careless thought.
There’s such
confusion--turn the cheek yet go
Acquire a sword as
well? Why wasn’t more
Care taken in the
drafting? All should know
That words have
consequences. Maimed, I bore
The scars of
mixed-up syllables. Before
More suffer needless
butchery, one ought
To master
language. I explored, therefore,
The peril and the
price of careless thought.
Lord, thus I did my
volumes. Since they store
All I discovered, I
can rest. Full taught
Below, no suffering
here would teach me more
The peril and the
price of careless thought. Thursday, June 9, 2016
Snow In August (A Book of Original Verse)
Snow In August
She had enjoyed sweet certain knowledge that,
however hot the summer, August brought
its welcome snows upon a boundary fence
that she had kept to please her neighbors, too.
Labels:
Bible,
Ethics,
Grammar,
Humanities,
Humor,
Interpretation,
Language,
Logic,
Morality,
Philosophy,
Poetry,
Pragmatism,
Religion,
Rhetoric,
Sonnet,
Time,
Translation,
Virtue,
Wisdom,
Words
Wednesday, June 8, 2016
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
Deborah's Sonnet Song (Additon to the Apology Box)
A bit of music! Life leaps over
speech!
Life leaves some greater parts beyond the reach
Of words alone. Therefore, God
gave us each.
I’ll sing of me who judged beneath a palm
And reckoned past and future. Thus, I knew
Jael would drive a stake in Sisera
Once she had feigned her hospitality.
I killed no guests, there’s no
hypocrisy
Here in my seeking hospitality.
Hear! I’ll sing purest notes beneath a palm
And judge not. Here in Heaven I’m
too new
To gauge Jael or even Sisera.
I’ll let the veterans guess at Sodom’s sin
Of harming guests one has invited in.
Labels:
Bible,
Deborah,
Hospitality,
Jael,
Music,
Old Testament,
Poetry,
Sin,
Sisera,
Sodom,
Sonnet,
Words
Monday, June 6, 2016
I Mined and Shared from Matchless Mines of Me: Two Sonnets of Job (Apology Box Additions)
In these days when some claim to follow so-called prosperity theology, it's of course good to remember the story of Job. It is, in fact, impossible to claim that one follows the Bible literally and yet also claim that God will lavish health and material reward on those who follow him. Similarly, suffering does not in and of itself indicate malfeasance. Both experience and Job tell us just the opposite. We see good people suffer, and we see people who do bad things prosper nonetheless. Of course, this is not to say that we are not often rewarded for good and that we are not often punished for doing wrong. Nor is this to say that at least some form of reputational "karma" does not exist. We of course build and lose reputations based upon our voluntary choices and we reap and suffer consequences of those choices. However, all this occurs in the context of a world coming at us in countless ways that are also beyond our control and that deliver both bounties and setbacks that we don't deserve. The best of us can live in poverty and ill-health despite our best efforts and those of us doing the worst can live in great prosperity. To claim otherwise (1) rejects both experience and the Book of Job, (2) rejects true humanity itself, (3) rejects the compassion and understanding true virtue requires, and (4) demeans grace which, frankly, we all need to appreciate and cultivate more.
Saturday, June 4, 2016
Friday, June 3, 2016
Apology Box Additions: Sampson & Delilah
Sampson’s Sonnet
The day
misleads. We’re blessed by losing eyes
Too easily
distracted by the rose
That colors over thorns, insects, and blight,
And feigns
geometries in petals though
True lines and
circles never can be drawn
On warped and
pitted canvases of earth.
The very
structure of the eye proclaims
That sight has
little worth. Jehovah would
Not make such
fragile orbs for vision if
It were a thing
for us to treasure much.
Delilah is more
proof. Unseen she could
Not use her outer
bloom for treachery.
By losing eyes, I
took on better sight
And found more
focus in the dark than light.
Delilah’s
Sonnet
How could
betrayal happen to a man
Who’d made a
wager, murdered when he’d lost,
Who knowingly
pushed massive pillars down
To crush a child that led him to the place,
Who’d used his
trust, dominion over beasts,
To bind their
tails and send them off in flames?
(I still can hear
the awful yelping of
The twice-red
foxes till the fires consumed
Their tiny
throats and tongues.) I had no choice.
He was a
monster. Villainy requires
Containment which
we did—yet let him live,
A courtesy he failed to show himself
A courtesy he failed to show himself
In taking his own
life that we had spared.
Delilah in return should, too, be spared.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)