(This blog combines, expands, and end-notes two prior blogs)
In addition to law and language generally, this blog explores philosophy, translation, poetry (including my own poetry and translations), legal education reform, genealogy, rhetoric, politics, and other things that interest me from time to time. I consider all my poems and translations flawed works in progress, tweak them unpredictably, and consider the latest-posted versions the latest "final" forms. I'd enjoy others' thoughts on anything posted. © Harold Anthony Lloyd 2024
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Sunday, March 5, 2017
Gorsuch and Originalism: Some Critiques from Logic, Scripture, and Art
(This blog combines, expands, and end-notes two prior blogs)
Labels:
Art,
Auden,
Balkin,
Bruegel,
Constitution,
Ekphrasis,
Gorsuch,
Icarus,
Interpretation,
Language,
Law,
Legal Theory,
Old Testament,
Originalism,
Poetry,
Pragmatics,
Religion,
Scalia,
Supreme Court,
Ten Commandments
Monday, February 27, 2017
Neil Gorsuch? Originalism and the Ten Commandments
Current Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch claims that judges should “apply
the law as it is, focusing backward, not forward, and looking to text,
structure, and history to decide what a reasonable reader at the time of
the events in question would have understood the law to be ....”
On its face, this is at best an odd claim. Laws are generally forward
looking in their desire to govern future behavior. And even if we could
always focus back to determine legal meaning, why would we want to
disconnect meaning from ongoing life in such a way? Why, for example,
should the absence of email in George Washington’s day mean our modern
use of email isn’t covered by our modern notions of “speech”? Excluding
email from “speech” today would be silly and we have refined “speech”
to include email in both law and in life. Of course, if we refine
meaning for “speech” and “email,” why shouldn’t we do the same for other
things in other contexts as they change with time? It’s hard to see
how Originalism’s odd backwardness isn’t fatal from the outset.
Friday, November 18, 2016
Pat McCrory Should Think Twice Before Trying To Pack The North Carolina Supreme Court
In this month’s North Carolina Supreme Court elections, Democrat Michael Morgan soundly defeated Republican Robert Edmunds thereby shifting control of the Court from Republicans to Democrats by a margin of one. With no Court vacancies “currently occurring” which Republican Governor Pat McCrory could fill to shift control back to Republicans, rumors are afoot that Pat McCrory will soon call a special session of the North Carolina General Assembly where the General Assembly will “create” two new Supreme Court “vacancies” for McCrory to “fill” with Republican justices. If this is true, it would not only be a stunning rebuke of democracy. It could well be unlawful under a best reading of the North Carolina Constitution.
Click here for remainder of post
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)